Athlon 64 X2 4400+ vs Athlon X2 7750 BE

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X2 7750 BE and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno data2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)
Architecture codenameKuma (2008−2009)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release dateDecember 2008 (15 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 7750 BE and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rateno data1000 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache2 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Die size285 mm2no data
Number of transistors450 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 7750 BE and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM2+no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 7750 BE and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Athlon X2 7750 BE has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 X2 4400+, on the other hand, has 46.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon X2 7750 BE and Athlon 64 X2 4400+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 7750 BE and Athlon 64 X2 4400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 7750 BE
Athlon X2 7750 BE
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
Athlon 64 X2 4400+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 49 votes

Rate Athlon X2 7750 BE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 140 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 7750 BE or Athlon 64 X2 4400+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.