Athlon 64 2000+ vs Athlon X2 7750 BE

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X2 7750 BE and Athlon 64 2000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated3370
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data1.18
Architecture codenameKuma (2008−2009)Lima (2008−2009)
Release dateDecember 2008 (15 years ago)June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 7750 BE and Athlon 64 2000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz1 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size285 mm277 mm2
Number of transistors450 million122 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 7750 BE and Athlon 64 2000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2+AM2
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt8 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 7750 BE and Athlon 64 2000+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 8 Watt

Athlon X2 7750 BE has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Athlon 64 2000+, on the other hand, has 1087.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon X2 7750 BE and Athlon 64 2000+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 7750 BE and Athlon 64 2000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 7750 BE
Athlon X2 7750 BE
AMD Athlon 64 2000+
Athlon 64 2000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 49 votes

Rate Athlon X2 7750 BE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 13 votes

Rate Athlon 64 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 7750 BE or Athlon 64 2000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.