A6-6310 vs Athlon X2 7750 BE
Primary details
Comparing Athlon X2 7750 BE and A6-6310 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 2421 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | AMD A-Series |
Power efficiency | no data | 6.62 |
Architecture codename | Kuma (2008−2009) | Beema (2014) |
Release date | December 2008 (15 years ago) | 29 April 2014 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon X2 7750 BE and A6-6310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Base clock speed | no data | 1.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2048 KB |
L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | 285 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 450 million | 930 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon X2 7750 BE and A6-6310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | AM2+ | FT3b |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 7750 BE and A6-6310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX |
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | FMA4 |
AVX | - | + |
PowerNow | - | + |
PowerGating | - | + |
VirusProtect | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 7750 BE and A6-6310 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 7750 BE and A6-6310. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3-1865 |
Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics |
Enduro | - | + |
Switchable graphics | - | + |
UVD | - | + |
VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Athlon X2 7750 BE and A6-6310 integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Athlon X2 7750 BE and A6-6310 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X2 7750 BE and A6-6310.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 15 Watt |
A6-6310 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon X2 7750 BE and A6-6310. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon X2 7750 BE is a desktop processor while A6-6310 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 7750 BE and A6-6310, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.