Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 vs Athlon X2 7550
Primary details
Comparing Athlon X2 7550 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Architecture codename | Kuma (2008−2009) | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) |
| Release date | December 2008 (15 years ago) | 4 June 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon X2 7550 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 36 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 285 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 450 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon X2 7550 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM2+ | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 7550 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XDNA 2 NPU |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 7550 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 12 |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 55 Watt |
Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process, and 72.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon X2 7550 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon X2 7550 is a desktop processor while Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 7550 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
