A4-9120 vs Athlon X2 340
Aggregate performance score
Athlon X2 340 outperforms A4-9120 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Athlon X2 340 and A4-9120 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2598 | 2655 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Bristol Ridge |
| Power efficiency | 1.19 | 4.86 |
| Architecture codename | Trinity (2012−2013) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 2 October 2012 (12 years ago) | 1 June 2017 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon X2 340 and A4-9120 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (shared) | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | 124.5 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,303 million | 1200 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon X2 340 and A4-9120 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FM2 | BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 340 and A4-9120. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Virtualization, |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 340 and A4-9120 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 340 and A4-9120. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1600 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X2 340 and A4-9120.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.82 | 0.77 |
| Recency | 2 October 2012 | 1 June 2017 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Athlon X2 340 has a 6.5% higher aggregate performance score.
A4-9120, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Athlon X2 340 and A4-9120.
Note that Athlon X2 340 is a desktop processor while A4-9120 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 340 and A4-9120, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
