Ryzen 3 3250U vs Athlon Silver 3050U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon Silver 3050U
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.89
Ryzen 3 3250U
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.41
+27.5%

Ryzen 3 3250U outperforms Athlon Silver 3050U by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Silver 3050U and Ryzen 3 3250U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19691768
Place by popularitynot in top-10096
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency11.8715.14
Architecture codenameDali (Zen) (2020)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon Silver 3050U and Ryzen 3 3250U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier2326
L1 cache192 KB192 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache4 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C95 °C
Number of transistors4500 Million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Silver 3050U and Ryzen 3 3250U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP5FP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Silver 3050U and Ryzen 3 3250U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Silver 3050U and Ryzen 3 3250U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Silver 3050U and Ryzen 3 3250U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 2AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon Silver 3050U and Ryzen 3 3250U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1212

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon Silver 3050U 1.89
Ryzen 3 3250U 2.41
+27.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon Silver 3050U 2993
Ryzen 3 3250U 3807
+27.2%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon Silver 3050U 773
+3.1%
Ryzen 3 3250U 750

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon Silver 3050U 1344
Ryzen 3 3250U 1456
+8.3%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Athlon Silver 3050U 1429
Ryzen 3 3250U 1662
+16.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.89 2.41
Threads 2 4

Ryzen 3 3250U has a 27.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

The Ryzen 3 3250U is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon Silver 3050U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Silver 3050U and Ryzen 3 3250U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Silver 3050U
Athlon Silver 3050U
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Ryzen 3 3250U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 8032 votes

Rate Athlon Silver 3050U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 2115 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3250U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Silver 3050U or Ryzen 3 3250U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.