Xeon E-2488 vs Athlon PRO 300U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon PRO 300U
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.57
Xeon E-2488
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
18.29
+612%

Xeon E-2488 outperforms Athlon PRO 300U by a whopping 612% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon PRO 300U and Xeon E-2488 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1728323
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data74.79
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Athlonno data
Power efficiency16.2118.22
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge 2 (2019)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date8 April 2019 (5 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$606

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon PRO 300U and Xeon E-2488 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache192 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size209.78 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4940 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon PRO 300U and Xeon E-2488 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon PRO 300U and Xeon E-2488. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+

Security technologies

Athlon PRO 300U and Xeon E-2488 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon PRO 300U and Xeon E-2488 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon PRO 300U and Xeon E-2488. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon PRO 300U and Xeon E-2488.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon PRO 300U 2.57
Xeon E-2488 18.29
+612%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon PRO 300U 4080
Xeon E-2488 29060
+612%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.57 18.29
Recency 8 April 2019 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 95 Watt

Athlon PRO 300U has 533.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2488, on the other hand, has a 611.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Xeon E-2488 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon PRO 300U in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon PRO 300U is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2488 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon PRO 300U and Xeon E-2488, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon PRO 300U
Athlon PRO 300U
Intel Xeon E-2488
Xeon E-2488

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon PRO 300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate Xeon E-2488 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon PRO 300U or Xeon E-2488, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.