Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Athlon PRO 300GE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon PRO 300GE
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.69
+84.2%
Core 2 Quad Q9550
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.46

Athlon PRO 300GE outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9550 by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon PRO 300GE and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17142176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD AthlonCore 2 Quad (Desktop)
Power efficiency7.321.46
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date30 September 2019 (5 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon PRO 300GE and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.83 GHz
Bus rateno data1333 MHz
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache192 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB12288 KB
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography12 nm45 nm
Die size209.78 mm22x 107 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistors4950 Million820 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon PRO 300GE and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket AM4LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR1,DDR2,DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon PRO 300GE 2.69
+84.2%
Core 2 Quad Q9550 1.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon PRO 300GE 4308
+84.2%
Core 2 Quad Q9550 2339

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon PRO 300GE 938
+154%
Core 2 Quad Q9550 370

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon PRO 300GE 1907
+83.2%
Core 2 Quad Q9550 1041

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.69 1.46
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 12 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

Athlon PRO 300GE has a 84.2% higher aggregate performance score, a 275% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

Core 2 Quad Q9550, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.

The Athlon PRO 300GE is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q9550 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon PRO 300GE and Core 2 Quad Q9550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon PRO 300GE
Athlon PRO 300GE
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
Core 2 Quad Q9550

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 117 votes

Rate Athlon PRO 300GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1878 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon PRO 300GE or Core 2 Quad Q9550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.