E-350 vs Athlon Neo X2 L325
Aggregate performance score
Athlon Neo X2 L325 outperforms E-350 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Athlon Neo X2 L325 and E-350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3119 | 3203 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Athlon Neo | AMD E-Series |
| Power efficiency | 1.85 | 1.38 |
| Architecture codename | Congo (2009) | Zacate (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) | 4 January 2011 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon Neo X2 L325 and E-350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1600 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Die size | no data | 75 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 90 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon Neo X2 L325 and E-350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | ASB1 | FT1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo X2 L325 and E-350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | HyperTransport 3.0, MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization Technology | MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo X2 L325 and E-350 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Neo X2 L325 and E-350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 6310 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.35 | 0.26 |
| Recency | 10 September 2009 | 4 January 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 40 nm |
Athlon Neo X2 L325 has a 34.6% higher aggregate performance score.
E-350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.
The Athlon Neo X2 L325 is our recommended choice as it beats the E-350 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
