i5-430UM vs Athlon Neo X2 L325

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon Neo X2 L325
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.35
Core i5-430UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.39
+11.4%

Core i5-430UM outperforms Athlon Neo X2 L325 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Core i5-430UM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30463000
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Athlon NeoIntel Core i5
Power efficiency1.842.05
Architecture codenameCongo (2009)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date10 September 2009 (15 years ago)20 June 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Core i5-430UM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rate1600 MHz1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data9
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data3 MB
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Core i5-430UM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketASB1BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Core i5-430UM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHyperTransport 3.0, MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization TechnologyIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA-+
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Core i5-430UM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Core i5-430UM are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Core i5-430UM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data12.799 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Core i5-430UM integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Core i5-430UM.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon Neo X2 L325 0.35
i5-430UM 0.39
+11.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon Neo X2 L325 556
i5-430UM 627
+12.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 0.39
Recency 10 September 2009 20 June 2010
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm

i5-430UM has a 11.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, 100% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i5-430UM is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon Neo X2 L325 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Core i5-430UM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325
Athlon Neo X2 L325
Intel Core i5-430UM
Core i5-430UM

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 8 votes

Rate Athlon Neo X2 L325 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 9 votes

Rate Core i5-430UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Neo X2 L325 or Core i5-430UM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.