Celeron 925 vs Athlon Neo X2 L325

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Celeron 925 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	2x AMD Athlon Neo	no data
Architecture codename	Congo (2009)	no data
Release date	10 September 2009 (15 years ago)	1 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Celeron 925 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	no data
Threads	2	no data
Base clock speed	no data	2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.5 GHz	no data
Bus rate	1600 MHz	no data
L2 cache	1 MB	no data
L3 cache	no data	1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography	65 nm	45 nm
Maximum core temperature	95 °C	105 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Celeron 925 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	ASB1	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Celeron 925. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	HyperTransport 3.0, MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization Technology	no data
VirusProtect	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	-
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	-

Security technologies

Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Celeron 925 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	-
EDB	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Celeron 925 are enumerated here.

VT-x

no data

-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Celeron 925. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR2

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	10 September 2009	1 January 2011
Chip lithography	65 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	35 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Celeron 925, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---