Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 vs Athlon Neo X2 L325

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	2x AMD Athlon Neo	2x Athlon 64
Architecture codename	Congo (2009)	Hawk-256
Release date	10 September 2009 (15 years ago)	no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Boost clock speed	1.5 GHz	1.7 GHz
Bus rate	1600 MHz	667 MHz
L2 cache	1 MB	no data
Chip lithography	65 nm	65 nm
Maximum core temperature	95 °C	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	ASB1	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	HyperTransport 3.0, MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization Technology	no data
VirusProtect	+	-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR2

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Power consumption (TDP)

18 Watt

31 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---