Ryzen 7 5800U vs Athlon Neo MV-40

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon Neo MV-40
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 15 Watt
0.17
Ryzen 7 5800U
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
11.58
+6712%

Ryzen 7 5800U outperforms Athlon Neo MV-40 by a whopping 6712% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 7 5800U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3260669
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon NeoAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency1.0773.06
Architecture codenameHuron (2009)Cezanne-U (Zen 3) (2021)
Release date6 January 2009 (15 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 7 5800U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speedno data1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rate1600 MHzno data
Multiplierno data19
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data180 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 7 5800U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketASB1FP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 7 5800U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, VirtualizationMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 7 5800U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 7 5800U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 7 5800U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon Neo MV-40 0.17
Ryzen 7 5800U 11.58
+6712%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon Neo MV-40 275
Ryzen 7 5800U 18393
+6588%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Athlon Neo MV-40 1274
Ryzen 7 5800U 6039
+374%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Athlon Neo MV-40 1149
Ryzen 7 5800U 26711
+2226%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Athlon Neo MV-40 102
Ryzen 7 5800U 4.11
+2382%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Athlon Neo MV-40 0
Ryzen 7 5800U 15
+4379%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Athlon Neo MV-40 2
Ryzen 7 5800U 81
+4022%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Athlon Neo MV-40 12
Ryzen 7 5800U 231
+1887%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 11.58
Recency 6 January 2009 12 January 2021
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm

Ryzen 7 5800U has a 6711.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 5800U is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon Neo MV-40 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 7 5800U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Neo MV-40
Athlon Neo MV-40
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
Ryzen 7 5800U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 11 votes

Rate Athlon Neo MV-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 743 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5800U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Neo MV-40 or Ryzen 7 5800U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.