Processor 300 vs Athlon Neo MV-40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon Neo MV-40
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 15 Watt
0.17
Processor 300
2024
2 cores / 4 threads, 46 Watt
4.51
+2553%

Processor 300 outperforms Athlon Neo MV-40 by a whopping 2553% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Neo MV-40 and Processor 300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32741319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Athlon Neono data
Power efficiency1.079.28
Architecture codenameHuron (2009)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date6 January 2009 (15 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$82

Detailed specifications

Athlon Neo MV-40 and Processor 300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate1600 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data163 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Neo MV-40 and Processor 300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketASB11700
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Processor 300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualizationno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Athlon Neo MV-40 and Processor 300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Processor 300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Processor 300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Processor 300.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon Neo MV-40 0.17
Processor 300 4.51
+2553%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon Neo MV-40 275
Processor 300 7160
+2504%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 4.51
Recency 6 January 2009 8 January 2024
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 46 Watt

Athlon Neo MV-40 has 206.7% lower power consumption.

Processor 300, on the other hand, has a 2552.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.

The Processor 300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon Neo MV-40 in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon Neo MV-40 is a notebook processor while Processor 300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo MV-40 and Processor 300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Neo MV-40
Athlon Neo MV-40
Intel Processor 300
Processor 300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 11 votes

Rate Athlon Neo MV-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate Processor 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Neo MV-40 or Processor 300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.