Atom N450 vs Athlon Neo MV-40

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Neo MV-40 and Atom N450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon NeoIntel Atom
Architecture codenameHuron (2009)Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Release date6 January 2009 (15 years ago)21 December 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$64

Detailed specifications

Athlon Neo MV-40 and Atom N450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.67 GHz
Bus rate1600 MHz533 MHz
L1 cache128 KB56 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data66 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data123 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Neo MV-40 and Atom N450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketASB1FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt5.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Atom N450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, VirtualizationIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-

Security technologies

Athlon Neo MV-40 and Atom N450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Atom N450 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Atom N450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2
Maximum memory sizeno data2 GB
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon Neo MV-40 275
+35.5%
Atom N450 203

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Athlon Neo MV-40 1274
+128%
Atom N450 560

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Athlon Neo MV-40 1149
+32.8%
Atom N450 865

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon Neo MV-40 614
+24.3%
Atom N450 494

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Athlon Neo MV-40 102
+14.7%
Atom N450 117

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Athlon Neo MV-40 0
+37.5%
Atom N450 0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2009 21 December 2009
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 5 Watt

Atom N450 has an age advantage of 11 months, 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon Neo MV-40 and Atom N450. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo MV-40 and Atom N450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Neo MV-40
Athlon Neo MV-40
Intel Atom N450
Atom N450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 11 votes

Rate Athlon Neo MV-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 174 votes

Rate Atom N450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Neo MV-40 or Atom N450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.