Iris Graphics 48 vs Athlon MP 2000+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon MP 2000+ and Iris Graphics 48 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon MPIntel Iris Graphics
Architecture codenameK7 (2000−2004)Gen9
Release date27 August 2002 (22 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$319no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon MP 2000+ and Iris Graphics 48 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)no data
Threads1no data
Boost clock speed1.67 GHz0.3 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate266 MT/sno data
Multiplier12.5no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache256 KBno data
Chip lithography130 nm14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm
Die size85 mm2no data
Number of transistors37 Millionno data
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon MP 2000+ and Iris Graphics 48 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
Power consumption (TDP)58.2 Wattno data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon MP 2000+ and Iris Graphics 48. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory size4 GB65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm

Iris Graphics 48 has a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon MP 2000+ and Iris Graphics 48. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Athlon MP 2000+ is a server/workstation processor while Iris Graphics 48 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon MP 2000+ and Iris Graphics 48, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon MP 2000+
Athlon MP 2000+
Intel Iris Graphics 48
Iris Graphics 48

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon MP 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 5 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon MP 2000+ or Iris Graphics 48, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.