Celeron N5095 vs Athlon MP 1600+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon MP 1600+ and Celeron N5095 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1724 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 31 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Athlon MP | Intel Jasper Lake |
| Power efficiency | no data | 16.23 |
| Architecture codename | K7 (2000−2004) | Jasper Lake (2021) |
| Release date | 15 October 2001 (23 years ago) | 11 January 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $210 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon MP 1600+ and Celeron N5095 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Bus type | FSB | no data |
| Bus rate | 266 MT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 10.5 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 1.5 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 128 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 38 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon MP 1600+ and Celeron N5095 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FCBGA1338 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62.8 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon MP 1600+ and Celeron N5095. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| vPro | no data | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Smart Response | no data | - |
| GPIO | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Security technologies
Athlon MP 1600+ and Celeron N5095 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon MP 1600+ and Celeron N5095 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon MP 1600+ and Celeron N5095. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 750 MHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 16 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Athlon MP 1600+ and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| MIPI-DSI | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Athlon MP 1600+ and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | no data | + |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096x2160@60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096x2160@60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 4096x2160@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Athlon MP 1600+ and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon MP 1600+ and Celeron N5095.
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
| USB revision | no data | 2.0/3.2 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 14 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | - |
| UART | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 October 2001 | 11 January 2021 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 15 Watt |
Celeron N5095 has an age advantage of 19 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 1700% more advanced lithography process, and 313.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon MP 1600+ and Celeron N5095. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Athlon MP 1600+ is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N5095 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon MP 1600+ and Celeron N5095, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
