Ryzen 7 5700U vs Athlon II X4 651K
Primary details
Comparing Athlon II X4 651K and Ryzen 7 5700U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 770 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 10 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Lucienne (Zen 2, Ryzen 5000) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 62.90 |
| Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | Lucienne-U (Zen 2) (2021) |
| Release date | 14 November 2011 (13 years ago) | 12 January 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon II X4 651K and Ryzen 7 5700U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 18 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 228 mm2 | 156 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 9,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon II X4 651K and Ryzen 7 5700U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FM1 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X4 651K and Ryzen 7 5700U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 651K and Ryzen 7 5700U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 651K and Ryzen 7 5700U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1900 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 651K and Ryzen 7 5700U.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 12 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 November 2011 | 12 January 2021 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 7 5700U has an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon II X4 651K and Ryzen 7 5700U. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon II X4 651K is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 5700U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 651K and Ryzen 7 5700U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
