E-450 vs Athlon II X4 651K
Primary details
Comparing Athlon II X4 651K and E-450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | AMD E-Series |
Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | Zacate (2011−2013) |
Release date | 14 November 2011 (12 years ago) | 22 August 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon II X4 651K and E-450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 3 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.65 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 40 nm |
Die size | 228 mm2 | 75 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon II X4 651K and E-450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FM1 | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X4 651K and E-450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 651K and E-450 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 651K and E-450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 6320 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 14 November 2011 | 22 August 2011 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 18 Watt |
Athlon II X4 651K has an age advantage of 2 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.
E-450, on the other hand, has 455.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon II X4 651K and E-450. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon II X4 651K is a desktop processor while E-450 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 651K and E-450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.