EPYC 9575F vs Athlon II X4 651

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X4 651 and EPYC 9575F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1827not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.13no data
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Turin (2024)
Release date14 November 2011 (13 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,791

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X4 651 and EPYC 9575F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads4128
Base clock speed3 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size228 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X4 651 and EPYC 9575F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFM1SP5
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X4 651 and EPYC 9575F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 651 and EPYC 9575F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 651 and EPYC 9575F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 651 and EPYC 9575F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 November 2011 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 64
Threads 4 128
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 400 Watt

Athlon II X4 651 has 300% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9575F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon II X4 651 and EPYC 9575F. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon II X4 651 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9575F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 651 and EPYC 9575F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X4 651
Athlon II X4 651
AMD EPYC 9575F
EPYC 9575F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 185 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 651 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9575F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X4 651 or EPYC 9575F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.