Pentium G630 vs Athlon II X4 620e

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X4 620e
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.83
+118%
Pentium G630
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.84

Athlon II X4 620e outperforms Pentium G630 by a whopping 118% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X4 620e and Pentium G630 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19952569
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.04
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.851.22
Architecture codenamePropus (2009−2011)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date3 May 2011 (13 years ago)4 September 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$100

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X4 620e and Pentium G630 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size169 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data69 °C
Number of transistors300 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X4 620e and Pentium G630 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X4 620e and Pentium G630. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Athlon II X4 620e and Pentium G630 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 620e and Pentium G630 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 620e and Pentium G630. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon II X4 620e and Pentium G630 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 620e and Pentium G630.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X4 620e 1.83
+118%
Pentium G630 0.84

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X4 620e 2906
+118%
Pentium G630 1336

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.83 0.84
Recency 3 May 2011 4 September 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

Athlon II X4 620e has a 117.9% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

Pentium G630, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Athlon II X4 620e is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G630 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 620e and Pentium G630, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X4 620e
Athlon II X4 620e
Intel Pentium G630
Pentium G630

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 3 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 620e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 355 votes

Rate Pentium G630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X4 620e or Pentium G630, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.