Celeron M 630 MHz vs Athlon II X3 445

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X3 445 and Celeron M 630 MHz processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2371not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.01no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataCeleron M
Power efficiency1.15no data
Architecture codenameRana (2009−2011)no data
Release date11 May 2010 (14 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$91no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X3 445 and Celeron M 630 MHz basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads31
Base clock speed3.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz0.63 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size169 mm2no data
Number of transistors300 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X3 445 and Celeron M 630 MHz compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt5 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X3 445 and Celeron M 630 MHz. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X3 445 and Celeron M 630 MHz.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 3 1
Threads 3 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 5 Watt

Athlon II X3 445 has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 630 MHz, on the other hand, has 1800% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon II X3 445 and Celeron M 630 MHz. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon II X3 445 is a desktop processor while Celeron M 630 MHz is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X3 445 and Celeron M 630 MHz, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X3 445
Athlon II X3 445
Intel Celeron M 630 MHz
Celeron M 630 MHz

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 204 votes

Rate Athlon II X3 445 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Celeron M 630 MHz on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X3 445 or Celeron M 630 MHz, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.