Phenom II X2 560 BE vs Athlon II X3 435
Primary details
Comparing Athlon II X3 435 and Phenom II X2 560 BE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2437 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.05 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | 1.03 | no data |
Architecture codename | Rana (2009−2011) | Callisto (2009−2010) |
Release date | 9 October 2009 (15 years ago) | 21 September 2010 (14 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon II X3 435 and Phenom II X2 560 BE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 3 (Tri-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 3 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | 169 mm2 | 258 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 300 million | 758 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon II X3 435 and Phenom II X2 560 BE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | AM3 | AM3 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 80 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X3 435 and Phenom II X2 560 BE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X3 435 and Phenom II X2 560 BE.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 9 October 2009 | 21 September 2010 |
Physical cores | 3 | 2 |
Threads | 3 | 2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 80 Watt |
Athlon II X3 435 has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
Phenom II X2 560 BE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 18.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon II X3 435 and Phenom II X2 560 BE. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X3 435 and Phenom II X2 560 BE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.