Celeron M 722 vs Athlon II X3 435
Primary details
Comparing Athlon II X3 435 and Celeron M 722 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2397 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.05 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron M |
| Architecture codename | Rana (2009−2011) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 9 October 2009 (14 years ago) | 1 October 2008 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon II X3 435 and Celeron M 722 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 3 (Tri-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 3 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.9 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 169 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 300 million | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon II X3 435 and Celeron M 722 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM3 | VGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 5.5 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X3 435 and Celeron M 722. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X3 435 and Celeron M 722.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 9 October 2009 | 1 October 2008 |
| Physical cores | 3 | 1 |
| Threads | 3 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 5 Watt |
Athlon II X3 435 has an age advantage of 1 year, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
Celeron M 722, on the other hand, has 1800% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon II X3 435 and Celeron M 722. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon II X3 435 is a desktop processor while Celeron M 722 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X3 435 and Celeron M 722, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
