Core 2 Duo E4600 vs Athlon II X3 415e

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X3 415e
2010
3 cores / 3 threads, 45 Watt
0.91
+85.7%
Core 2 Duo E4600
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.49

Athlon II X3 415e outperforms Core 2 Duo E4600 by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X3 415e and Core 2 Duo E4600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25442898
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.97no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.910.71
Architecture codenameRana (2009−2011)Allendale (2006−2009)
Release date11 May 2010 (14 years ago)October 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X3 415e and Core 2 Duo E4600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads32
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size169 mm2111 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data73 °C
Number of transistors300 million167 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X3 415e and Core 2 Duo E4600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X3 415e and Core 2 Duo E4600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Athlon II X3 415e and Core 2 Duo E4600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X3 415e and Core 2 Duo E4600 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X3 415e and Core 2 Duo E4600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X3 415e and Core 2 Duo E4600.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X3 415e 0.91
+85.7%
Core 2 Duo E4600 0.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X3 415e 1441
+83.6%
Core 2 Duo E4600 785

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.91 0.49
Physical cores 3 2
Threads 3 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

Athlon II X3 415e has a 85.7% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

The Athlon II X3 415e is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E4600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X3 415e and Core 2 Duo E4600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X3 415e
Athlon II X3 415e
Intel Core 2 Duo E4600
Core 2 Duo E4600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 18 votes

Rate Athlon II X3 415e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 207 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X3 415e or Core 2 Duo E4600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.