A4-6300B vs Athlon II X2 280

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X2 280
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.87
+2.4%
A4-6300B
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.85

Athlon II X2 280 outperforms A4-6300B by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X2 280 and A4-6300B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25582575
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.52no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.241.21
Architecture codenameRegor (2009−2013)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date6 February 2013 (11 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$100no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X2 280 and A4-6300B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache128 KB96K
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size117 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors410 million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X2 280 and A4-6300B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FM2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X2 280 and A4-6300B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
PowerNow-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X2 280 and A4-6300B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X2 280 and A4-6300B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3DDR3-1600

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon HD 8370D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X2 280 and A4-6300B.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X2 280 0.87
+2.4%
A4-6300B 0.85

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X2 280 1355
+2%
A4-6300B 1328

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.87 0.85
Recency 6 February 2013 1 June 2013
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm

Athlon II X2 280 has a 2.4% higher aggregate performance score.

A4-6300B, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Athlon II X2 280 and A4-6300B.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X2 280 and A4-6300B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X2 280
Athlon II X2 280
AMD A4-6300B
A4-6300B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 54 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 17 votes

Rate A4-6300B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X2 280 or A4-6300B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.