A4-3400 vs Athlon II X2 280

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X2 280
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.85
+25%
A4-3400
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.68

Athlon II X2 280 outperforms A4-3400 by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X2 280 and A4-3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25602720
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.52no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.240.99
Architecture codenameRegor (2009−2013)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date6 February 2013 (11 years ago)7 September 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$100no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X2 280 and A4-3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size117 mm2228 mm2
Number of transistors410 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X2 280 and A4-3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FM1
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X2 280 and A4-3400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X2 280 and A4-3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon HD 6410D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X2 280 and A4-3400.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X2 280 0.85
+25%
A4-3400 0.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X2 280 1355
+24.8%
A4-3400 1086

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon II X2 280 446
+54.3%
A4-3400 289

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon II X2 280 821
+69.3%
A4-3400 485

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.85 0.68
Recency 6 February 2013 7 September 2011
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm

Athlon II X2 280 has a 25% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

A4-3400, on the other hand, has a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Athlon II X2 280 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-3400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X2 280 and A4-3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X2 280
Athlon II X2 280
AMD A4-3400
A4-3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 54 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 83 votes

Rate A4-3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X2 280 or A4-3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.