Celeron D 352 vs Athlon II X2 250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X2 250
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.68
+300%
Celeron D 352
2006
1 core / 1 thread, 86 Watt
0.17

Athlon II X2 250 outperforms Celeron D 352 by a whopping 300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X2 250 and Celeron D 352 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27403275
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.61no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.990.19
Architecture codenameRegor (2009−2013)Cedar Mill (2006)
Release date2 June 2009 (15 years ago)May 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$39no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X2 250 and Celeron D 352 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed3 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache256 KB16 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size117 mm2109 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data69 °C
Number of transistors410 million125 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.25V-1.325V

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X2 250 and Celeron D 352 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt86 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X2 250 and Celeron D 352. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Athlon II X2 250 and Celeron D 352 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X2 250 and Celeron D 352 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X2 250 and Celeron D 352. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X2 250 and Celeron D 352.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X2 250 0.68
+300%
Celeron D 352 0.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X2 250 1080
+294%
Celeron D 352 274

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 0.17
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 86 Watt

Athlon II X2 250 has a 300% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 32.3% lower power consumption.

The Athlon II X2 250 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron D 352 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X2 250 and Celeron D 352, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X2 250
Athlon II X2 250
Intel Celeron D 352
Celeron D 352

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1172 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 35 votes

Rate Celeron D 352 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X2 250 or Celeron D 352, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.