Pentium M 738 vs Athlon II P360

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II P360 and Pentium M 738 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon IIPentium M
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date16 December 2010 (13 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon II P360 and Pentium M 738 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus rate3200 MHz400 MHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II P360 and Pentium M 738 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1g4no data
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II P360 and Pentium M 738. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE-3, SSE4A, 3DNow!, MMX, DEP, SVMno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Athlon II P360 33.3
+284%
Pentium M 738 128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 10 Watt

Athlon II P360 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium M 738, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon II P360 and Pentium M 738. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II P360 and Pentium M 738, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II P360
Athlon II P360
Intel Pentium M 738
Pentium M 738

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 95 votes

Rate Athlon II P360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 3 votes

Rate Pentium M 738 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II P360 or Pentium M 738, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.