Athlon Silver 3050U vs Athlon II P340

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II P340
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.44
Athlon Silver 3050U
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.88
+327%

Athlon Silver 3050U outperforms Athlon II P340 by a whopping 327% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II P340 and Athlon Silver 3050U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29371971
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon IIAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Power efficiency1.6711.86
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release date4 October 2010 (14 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon II P340 and Athlon Silver 3050U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate3200 MHzno data
Multiplierno data23
L1 cache256 KB192 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II P340 and Athlon Silver 3050U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1g4FP5
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II P340 and Athlon Silver 3050U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE-3, SSE4A, 3DNow!, MMX, DEP, SVMMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II P340 and Athlon Silver 3050U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II P340 and Athlon Silver 3050U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 2 ( - 1100 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II P340 and Athlon Silver 3050U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II P340 0.44
Athlon Silver 3050U 1.88
+327%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II P340 704
Athlon Silver 3050U 2993
+325%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon II P340 187
Athlon Silver 3050U 774
+314%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon II P340 307
Athlon Silver 3050U 1345
+338%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.44 1.88
Recency 4 October 2010 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

Athlon Silver 3050U has a 327.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Athlon Silver 3050U is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II P340 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II P340 and Athlon Silver 3050U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II P340
Athlon II P340
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U
Athlon Silver 3050U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 76 votes

Rate Athlon II P340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 8037 votes

Rate Athlon Silver 3050U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II P340 or Athlon Silver 3050U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.