Celeron N2805 vs Athlon II Neo K145

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II Neo K145
2010
1 core / 1 thread, 12 Watt
0.19
Celeron N2805
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.21
+10.5%

Celeron N2805 outperforms Athlon II Neo K145 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II Neo K145 and Celeron N2805 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32533215
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon II NeoIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.504.97
Architecture codenameNile (2010)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date15 December 2010 (14 years ago)11 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Athlon II Neo K145 and Celeron N2805 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1.46 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1.46 GHz
Bus rate2000 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB56K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data80 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II Neo K145 and Celeron N2805 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt4.3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II Neo K145 and Celeron N2805. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3dDNow!, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualizationno data
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Athlon II Neo K145 and Celeron N2805 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II Neo K145 and Celeron N2805 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II Neo K145 and Celeron N2805. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon II Neo K145 and Celeron N2805 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II Neo K145 and Celeron N2805.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II Neo K145 0.19
Celeron N2805 0.21
+10.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II Neo K145 298
Celeron N2805 335
+12.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.19 0.21
Recency 15 December 2010 11 September 2013
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 4 Watt

Celeron N2805 has a 10.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N2805 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II Neo K145 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II Neo K145 and Celeron N2805, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II Neo K145
Athlon II Neo K145
Intel Celeron N2805
Celeron N2805

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 8 votes

Rate Athlon II Neo K145 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 101 vote

Rate Celeron N2805 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II Neo K145 or Celeron N2805, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.