Pentium Gold 8505 vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
Aggregate performance score
Pentium Gold 8505 outperforms Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE and Pentium Gold 8505 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1340 | 1115 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 11.86 | 10.03 |
| Architecture codename | Dali (2020) | no data |
| Release date | 21 July 2020 (4 years ago) | 1 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE and Pentium Gold 8505 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 4 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE and Pentium Gold 8505 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE and Pentium Gold 8505. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE and Pentium Gold 8505 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE and Pentium Gold 8505 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE and Pentium Gold 8505. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | Intel UHD Graphics for 12th Gen Intel Processors |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.1 GHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 48 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE and Pentium Gold 8505 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 4 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE and Pentium Gold 8505 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE and Pentium Gold 8505 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12.1 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE and Pentium Gold 8505.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.41 | 5.86 |
| Integrated graphics card | 2.98 | 5.58 |
| Recency | 21 July 2020 | 1 January 2022 |
| Threads | 4 | 6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE has 57.1% lower power consumption.
Pentium Gold 8505, on the other hand, has a 32.9% higher aggregate performance score, 87.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and 50% more threads.
The Pentium Gold 8505 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE in performance tests.
Note that Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE is a desktop processor while Pentium Gold 8505 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE and Pentium Gold 8505, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
