EPYC 9474F vs Athlon Gold 7220U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon Gold 7220U
2022
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.92
EPYC 9474F
2022
48 cores / 96 threads, 360 Watt
66.11
+2164%

EPYC 9474F outperforms Athlon Gold 7220U by a whopping 2164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Gold 7220U and EPYC 9474F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking166111
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.58
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesMendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)AMD EPYC
Power efficiency18.4217.38
Architecture codenameMendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date20 September 2022 (2 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,780

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon Gold 7220U and EPYC 9474F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads496
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache64 KB (per core)3 MB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)48 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography6 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size100 mm28x 72 mm2
Number of transistorsno data52,560 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Gold 7220U and EPYC 9474F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP6SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Gold 7220U and EPYC 9474F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Gold 7220U and EPYC 9474F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Gold 7220U and EPYC 9474F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5 Dual-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon Gold 7220U and EPYC 9474F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon Gold 7220U 2.92
EPYC 9474F 66.11
+2164%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon Gold 7220U 4636
EPYC 9474F 105010
+2165%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.92 66.11
Recency 20 September 2022 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 48
Threads 4 96
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 360 Watt

Athlon Gold 7220U has 2300% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9474F, on the other hand, has a 2164% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9474F is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon Gold 7220U in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon Gold 7220U is a notebook processor while EPYC 9474F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Gold 7220U and EPYC 9474F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Gold 7220U
Athlon Gold 7220U
AMD EPYC 9474F
EPYC 9474F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 97 votes

Rate Athlon Gold 7220U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 19 votes

Rate EPYC 9474F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Gold 7220U or EPYC 9474F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.