m3-8114Y vs Athlon 650
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 650 and Core m3-8114Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Thunderbird (1999−2000) | Cannon Lake-Y (2018) |
| Release date | 29 November 1999 (24 years ago) | 5 May 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $849 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 650 and Core m3-8114Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Boost clock speed | 0.65 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 102 mm2 | 123 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 22 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 650 and Core m3-8114Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | A | Intel BGA1440 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 650 and Core m3-8114Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Athlon 650 and Core m3-8114Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 650 and Core m3-8114Y are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 650 and Core m3-8114Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Iris Pro Plus |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 November 1999 | 5 May 2018 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 28 Watt |
m3-8114Y has an age advantage of 18 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 1700% more advanced lithography process, and 7.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 650 and Core m3-8114Y. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 650 is a desktop processor while Core m3-8114Y is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 650 and Core m3-8114Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
