Ryzen 3 5300U vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-57

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Ryzen 3 5300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1083
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x Athlon 64AMD Lucienne (Zen 2, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiencyno data38.45
Architecture codenameHawk-256Lucienne-U (Zen 2) (2021)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Ryzen 3 5300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
Multiplierno data26
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Ryzen 3 5300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFP6
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Ryzen 3 5300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Ryzen 3 5300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Ryzen 3 5300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Ryzen 3 5300U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 620
Ryzen 3 5300U 9685
+1462%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 176
Ryzen 3 5300U 1214
+590%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 315
Ryzen 3 5300U 3601
+1043%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 3 5300U has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 106.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Ryzen 3 5300U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Ryzen 3 5300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-57
Athlon 64 X2 TK-57
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
Ryzen 3 5300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 22 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1969 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 5300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 or Ryzen 3 5300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.