Opteron 4386 vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-57

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 TK-57
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.39
Opteron 4386
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
2.06
+428%

Opteron 4386 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 by a whopping 428% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Opteron 4386 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30221904
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Series2x Athlon 64no data
Power efficiency1.192.05
Architecture codenameHawk-256Seoul (2012)
Release dateno data4 December 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Opteron 4386 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data384 KB
L2 cacheno data8192 KB
L3 cacheno data8192 KB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Opteron 4386 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataC32
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Opteron 4386. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Opteron 4386 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Opteron 4386. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 0.39
Opteron 4386 2.06
+428%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 620
Opteron 4386 3273
+428%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.39 2.06
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 95 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 has 206.5% lower power consumption.

Opteron 4386, on the other hand, has a 428.2% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Opteron 4386 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 is a notebook processor while Opteron 4386 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 and Opteron 4386, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-57
Athlon 64 X2 TK-57
AMD Opteron  4386
Opteron 4386

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 22 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 4386 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 or Opteron 4386, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.