Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-53

Place in the ranking	3043	441
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	2x Athlon 64	AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency	1.07	52.63
Architecture codename	Hawk-256	Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date	no data (2024 years ago)	3 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	2	16
Base clock speed	no data	3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.7 GHz	5.1 GHz
Bus rate	667 MHz	no data
L1 cache	no data	512 KB
L2 cache	no data	8 MB
L3 cache	no data	16 MB
Chip lithography	65 nm	4 nm
Die size	no data	178 mm²
Maximum core temperature	no data	100 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)

31 Watt

28 Watt

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 0.35

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 15.57
+4349%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 558

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 24740
+4334%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 167

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 2152
+1189%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 307

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 9525
+3003%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.35	15.57
Physical cores	2	8
Threads	2	16
Chip lithography	65 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	31 Watt	28 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U has a 4348.6% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 1525% more advanced lithography process, and 10.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.