Ryzen 7 7840U vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-42

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 20 Watt
0.36
Ryzen 7 7840U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
15.55
+4219%

Ryzen 7 7840U outperforms Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 by a whopping 4219% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Ryzen 7 7840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3110456
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Athlon 64AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency1.7152.89
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameTyler (2007−2009)Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date1 November 2009 (15 years ago)May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Ryzen 7 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate1600 MHzno data
L1 cache0 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Ryzen 7 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket S1FP8
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Ryzen 7 7840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP), MMX, PowerNow, SSE3,-64, Enhanced 3DNowno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
VirusProtect+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Ryzen 7 7840U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Ryzen 7 7840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-5600

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Ryzen 7 7840U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 0.36
Ryzen 7 7840U 15.55
+4219%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 577
Ryzen 7 7840U 24951
+4224%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 15.55
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 28 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 has 40% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 7840U, on the other hand, has a 4219.4% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840U is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
Ryzen 7 7840U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 291 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 7840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Ryzen 7 7840U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.