Mobile Sempron M100 vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-42

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Mobile Sempron M100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Athlon 64AMD Mobile Sempron
Architecture codenameTyler (2007−2009)Caspian (2009)
Release date1 November 2009 (14 years ago)10 September 2009 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Mobile Sempron M100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate1600 MHz3200 MHz
L1 cache0 MB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
Chip lithography65 nm40 nm
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Mobile Sempron M100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketSocket S1S
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Mobile Sempron M100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP), MMX, PowerNow, SSE3,-64, Enhanced 3DNowAMD Virtualization, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNow, Enhanced Virus Protection, MMX
PowerNow+-
VirusProtect++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2009 10 September 2009
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 25 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 has an age advantage of 1 month, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 25% lower power consumption.

Mobile Sempron M100, on the other hand, has a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Mobile Sempron M100. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Mobile Sempron M100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
AMD Mobile Sempron M100
Mobile Sempron M100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron M100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 or Mobile Sempron M100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.