Core 2 Solo ULV U2100 vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Core 2 Solo ULV U2100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3083 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Athlon 64 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.71 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Tyler (2007−2009) | Merom-L (2007) |
| Release date | 1 November 2009 (15 years ago) | September 2007 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Core 2 Solo ULV U2100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.07 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1600 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 0 MB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | no data | 143 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 291 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Core 2 Solo ULV U2100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | Socket S1 | Intel BGA 956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Core 2 Solo ULV U2100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP), MMX, PowerNow, SSE3,-64, Enhanced 3DNow | no data |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Core 2 Solo ULV U2100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 5 Watt |
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Core 2 Solo ULV U2100, on the other hand, has 300% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Core 2 Solo ULV U2100. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Core 2 Solo ULV U2100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
