Athlon II X4 740 vs Athlon 64 X2 FX-60
Aggregate performance score
Athlon II X4 740 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 by a whopping 196% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Athlon II X4 740 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2825 | 2067 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | 2x Athlon 64 (Desktop) | Athlon |
| Power efficiency | 0.49 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Toledo (2006) | Piledriver |
| Release date | no data | 1 October 2012 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $71 |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Athlon II X4 740 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1000 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 32 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Athlon II X4 740 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | Socket FM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 65 watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.57 | 1.69 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 65 Watt |
Athlon II X4 740 has a 196.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 69.2% lower power consumption.
The Athlon II X4 740 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Athlon II X4 740, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
