EPYC 7742 vs Athlon 64 X2 5600+

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 5600+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.57
EPYC 7742
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
44.07
+7632%

EPYC 7742 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5600+ by a whopping 7632% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 5600+ and EPYC 7742 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking283245
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.55
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency0.6118.54
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release dateDecember 2006 (18 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,950

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 5600+ and EPYC 7742 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speedno data2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplierno data22.5
L1 cache256 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache512K512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size220 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors227 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 5600+ and EPYC 7742 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM2TR4
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 5600+ and EPYC 7742. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 5600+ and EPYC 7742 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 5600+ and EPYC 7742. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 0.57
EPYC 7742 44.07
+7632%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 903
EPYC 7742 70007
+7653%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 231
EPYC 7742 1263
+447%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 401
EPYC 7742 12501
+3017%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 44.07
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 225 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 5600+ has 152.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7742, on the other hand, has a 7631.6% higher aggregate performance score, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7742 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 X2 5600+ is a desktop processor while EPYC 7742 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 5600+ and EPYC 7742, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
AMD EPYC 7742
EPYC 7742

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 116 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 129 votes

Rate EPYC 7742 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 5600+ or EPYC 7742, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.