Core 2 Quad Q9505S vs Athlon 64 X2 5600+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 5600+ and Core 2 Quad Q9505S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2809not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.61no data
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)no data
Release dateDecember 2006 (17 years ago)1 July 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 5600+ and Core 2 Quad Q9505S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads2no data
Base clock speedno data2.83 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHzno data
Bus rateno data1333 MHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache512Kno data
L3 cache0 KB6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
Die size220 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data76 °C
Number of transistors227 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 5600+ and Core 2 Quad Q9505S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM2LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 5600+ and Core 2 Quad Q9505S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-

Security technologies

Athlon 64 X2 5600+ and Core 2 Quad Q9505S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 5600+ and Core 2 Quad Q9505S are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 65 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9505S has 100% more physical cores, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 36.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 5600+ and Core 2 Quad Q9505S. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 5600+ and Core 2 Quad Q9505S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505S
Core 2 Quad Q9505S

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 115 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 8 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9505S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 5600+ or Core 2 Quad Q9505S, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.