A6-7310 vs Athlon 64 X2 4800+

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 4800+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.43
A6-7310
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.69
+293%

A6-7310 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4800+ by a whopping 293% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and A6-7310 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29722058
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Series2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)AMD A-Series
Power efficiency0.626.36
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Carrizo-L (2015)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)7 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and A6-7310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate1000 MHzno data
L1 cache256Kno data
L2 cache512K2048 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm28 nm
Die size220 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors233 million930 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and A6-7310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket939FP4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt12-25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and A6-7310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and A6-7310 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and A6-7310. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3L-1866
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and A6-7310 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and A6-7310 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and A6-7310.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 0.43
A6-7310 1.69
+293%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 679
A6-7310 2689
+296%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.43 1.69
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 12 Watt

A6-7310 has a 293% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 441.7% lower power consumption.

The A6-7310 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 X2 4800+ is a desktop processor while A6-7310 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 4800+ and A6-7310, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+
Athlon 64 X2 4800+
AMD A6-7310
A6-7310

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 75 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 510 votes

Rate A6-7310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 4800+ or A6-7310, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.