Ryzen 7 4800H vs Athlon 64 X2 4400+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Ryzen 7 4800H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated665
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Series2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Power efficiencyno data20.40
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Ryzen 7 4800H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus rate1000 MHzno data
Multiplierno data29
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Ryzen 7 4800H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFP6
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Ryzen 7 4800H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Ryzen 7 4800H are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Ryzen 7 4800H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Vega 7

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Ryzen 7 4800H.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 4400+ 675
Ryzen 7 4800H 18482
+2638%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon 64 X2 4400+ 1639
Ryzen 7 4800H 12683
+674%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 54 Watt

Ryzen 7 4800H has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 20.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 4400+ and Ryzen 7 4800H. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 X2 4400+ is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 4800H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 4400+ and Ryzen 7 4800H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
Athlon 64 X2 4400+
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
Ryzen 7 4800H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 140 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3316 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 4800H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 4400+ or Ryzen 7 4800H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.