Pentium 4 HT 631 vs Athlon 64 X2 3800+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and Pentium 4 HT 631 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameManchester (2005−2006)Cedar Mill (2006)
Release dateAugust 2005 (19 years ago)January 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and Pentium 4 HT 631 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache256K28 KB
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Die size220 mm281 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data69 °C
Number of transistors154 million188 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and Pentium 4 HT 631 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket939775
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt86 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and Pentium 4 HT 631. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 86 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 3800+ has 100% more physical cores.

Pentium 4 HT 631, on the other hand, has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 3.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and Pentium 4 HT 631. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and Pentium 4 HT 631, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
Intel Pentium 4 HT 631
Pentium 4 HT 631

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 94 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 81 vote

Rate Pentium 4 HT 631 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 3800+ or Pentium 4 HT 631, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.