Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U vs Athlon 64 X2 3600+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 X2 3600+ and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 676 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 72.44 |
| Architecture codename | Manchester (2005−2006) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| Release date | 31 May 2005 (19 years ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 X2 3600+ and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 156 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 154 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 X2 3600+ and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 939 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 15 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 3600+ and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | AMD Radeon 740M |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 31 May 2005 | 23 May 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U has an age advantage of 17 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 2150% more advanced lithography process, and 493.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 3600+ and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 64 X2 3600+ is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 3600+ and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
