Ryzen 7 4800H vs Athlon 64 TF-20

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 TF-20
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.16
Ryzen 7 4800H
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
11.62
+7163%

Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms Athlon 64 TF-20 by a whopping 7163% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 TF-20 and Ryzen 7 4800H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3300673
Place by popularitynot in top-10090
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon 64AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Power efficiency0.6124.42
Architecture codenameSherman (2009)Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)
Release date1 May 2009 (15 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 TF-20 and Ryzen 7 4800H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speedno data2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
Multiplierno data29
L1 cache0.1 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 TF-20 and Ryzen 7 4800H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1g1FP6
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Ryzen 7 4800H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus ProtectionMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Ryzen 7 4800H are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Ryzen 7 4800H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Ryzen 7 4800H.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 TF-20 0.16
Ryzen 7 4800H 11.62
+7163%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Athlon 64 TF-20 1245
Ryzen 7 4800H 5684
+357%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon 64 TF-20 612
Ryzen 7 4800H 12683
+1972%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 11.62
Recency 1 May 2009 6 January 2020
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 45 Watt

Athlon 64 TF-20 has 80% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 4800H, on the other hand, has a 7162.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 4800H is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 TF-20 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 TF-20 and Ryzen 7 4800H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 TF-20
Athlon 64 TF-20
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
Ryzen 7 4800H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 34 votes

Rate Athlon 64 TF-20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3368 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 4800H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 TF-20 or Ryzen 7 4800H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.