Pentium D 830 vs Athlon 64 FX-53

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 FX-53
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 89 Watt
0.41
+13.9%
Pentium D 830
2005
2 cores / 2 threads, 130 Watt
0.36

Athlon 64 FX-53 outperforms Pentium D 830 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 FX-53 and Pentium D 830 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29993057
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.440.26
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Smithfield (2005)
Release dateJune 2004 (20 years ago)May 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$30no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 FX-53 and Pentium D 830 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache128 KB28 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography130 nm90 nm
Die size193 mm2206 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Number of transistors105 million169 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.2V-1.4V

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 FX-53 and Pentium D 830 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket939PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 FX-53 and Pentium D 830. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Athlon 64 FX-53 and Pentium D 830 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 FX-53 and Pentium D 830 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 FX-53 and Pentium D 830. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 FX-53 0.41
+13.9%
Pentium D 830 0.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 FX-53 646
+14.5%
Pentium D 830 564

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.41 0.36
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 130 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 130 Watt

Athlon 64 FX-53 has a 13.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 46.1% lower power consumption.

Pentium D 830, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Athlon 64 FX-53 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium D 830 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-53 and Pentium D 830, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 FX-53
Athlon 64 FX-53
Intel Pentium D 830
Pentium D 830

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Athlon 64 FX-53 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 30 votes

Rate Pentium D 830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 FX-53 or Pentium D 830, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.