VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 vs Athlon 64 3800+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 3800+ and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | C7-M |
| Architecture codename | Venice (2004−2005) | Esther |
| Release date | June 2004 (20 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 3800+ and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 230 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 227 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 3800+ and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 939 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 20 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 3800+ and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 20 Watt |
VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 345% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 3800+ and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 64 3800+ is a desktop processor while VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 3800+ and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
